|
PHILOSOPHY I |
by Terry A.
Rondberg, D.C. |
"WHY TALK CHIROPRACTIC
PHILOSOPHY?"
Chiropractic
doesn't HAVE a philosophy ... chiropractic
IS a philosophy.
|
|
When chiropractors get
together, they often discuss philosophy.
Yet, you will seldom hear them mentioning
Plato and Aristotle, or comparing notes on
Nietzsche or Emerson. The philosophy they
are most interested in is chiropractic
philosophy, the fundamental beliefs and
underlying precepts of the entire
profession.
Many people find it odd
that chiropractic has its own philosophy.
After all, other professions don't have
one. Have you ever heard of pediatric
philosophy – accounting philosophy – or
legal philosophy? Why, then, does
chiropractic have a philosophy?
Actually, it is somewhat
misleading to say that chiropractic has a
philosophy. According to Dr. B.J. Palmer,
the developer of chiropractic (whose
father, D.D. Palmer, is credited with its
actual "discovery" in 1895), chiropractic
IS a philosophy – as well as a science and
an art.
That is, chiropractic is
not merely a method of adjusting a
person's spine or correcting subluxations.
It is a set of beliefs about the human
body and the natural order of the
universe.
These beliefs – this
philosophy – is the WHY of chiropractic.
The science and art of chiropractic (such
as the specific adjusting techniques) were
developed, and are used, in accordance
with the philosophy.
Chiropractic is unique
in this respect. Other professions are not
based on a set of unchangeable principles.
The legal profession, for example, deals
with a system of laws and statutes that
change rapidly. A few years ago, it was
legal to cruise 75 MPH on most highways.
Today, it's against the law.
Even a single action can
be viewed differently depending on the
circumstances surrounding it. Taking
another person's life, for instance, can
be murder, manslaughter, negligent
homicide, or justifiable homicide. There
is no single, universal principle by which
to judge the action. Lawyers, then, must
deal with rules and laws that fluctuate
with time, location, and society's
preferences. The same is true of
accounting. Try to convince a tax
accountant that tax laws are consistent. |
Even the field of medicine
changes according to the latest research
results. Not long ago, for example, M.D.s
were routinely taking tonsils out as a
preventive measure. Today, it is a rare
procedure.
In chiropractic, the
basic underlying precepts remain unchanged
and unchangeable. Understanding of those
beliefs may deepen, and the techniques may
improve, but the elemental doctrines will
be constant. The importance of philosophy
to the chiropractic profession cannot be
stressed enough, for it is the basis of
everything a principled chiropractor does.
According to one of the
profession's early philosophers, Ralph
Stephenson, D.C., "It is the explanation
of everything chiropractic – the
difference between a good chiropractor and
a poor one is, that the good one has an
ample supply of abstract principles in his
head and the poor one only a few – Poor
chiropractors are apt to substitute
machinery for knowledge."
Although there are many
principles which comprise chiropractic
philosophy, a few of the key ones include:
- There exists a
Universal Intelligence which brings
organization to all matter, and
maintains its existence;
- All living things
have inborn, or Innate Intelligence
which adapts universal forces and matter
for use in the body;
- Every living thing
has ALL the Innate Intelligence it
requires to maintain its life and
optimal health;
- Health is the
expression of the Innate Intelligence
through Innate Matter, via
Innate Energy;
- When there is
interference with the transmission of
Innate Energy, the result is a decrease
in the expression of Innate
Intelligence, which chiropractors call
dis-ease (not to be confused with
disease!).
Because these terms and
concepts are so important to chiropractors
– and their patients – they will be
explained in detail in the other
"booklets" in this series. When you
understand chiropractic philosophy, you
will know that chiropractic works – and
why! |
|
|
PHILOSOPHY
II |
by
Terry A. Rondberg, D.C. |
"INDUCTIVE
REASONING"
Inductive
reasoning goes from the small to the
large,
from the part to the whole, from one
to the all.
|
|
If you were to
measure 20 carrots, and found that
they were all between six and eight
inches long, you might conclude that
all carrots were in that size
range. The manner of logic you used
to draw your conclusion is called
inductive reasoning. According
to the philosopher John Stuart Mill,
its chief proponent, we are using
inductive reasoning when we conclude
"that what is true of certain
individuals of a class, is
true of the whole class, or what
is true at a certain time will be
true in similar circumstances at all
times."
He argued that
this logic is possible because there
is a certain "uniformity" in nature
which allows for such conclusions to
be made. The classical example used
to illustrate inductive reasoning is
the "fact" that all human
beings are mortal. To prove this
"fact," however, all human
beings would have to be dead
already. Obviously, some of us are
still around! How can we be sure
that one of us won't live forever?
We can't. However, through inductive
reasoning, we can conclude that
there is an extremely high
probability that all human
beings are mortal.
Many scientific
"laws" are a result of inductive
reasoning – even though it is, a
matter of probability. Astronomer
Johannes Kepler, for instance, noted
the position of the planet Mars
during several points of its orbit.
Working on the assumption that
natural orbits maintain a uniform
geometry, he induced that the orbit
had to be in the shape of an
ellipse. In fact, if you were to
actually calculate the planet's
position during ALL of the points of
its orbit, it would, in fact, trace
an almost perfect ellipse. No one
has ever discovered a planet that
didn't follow his principle, which
has become known as "Kepler's Law"
of planetary orbit.
No one has
discovered an exception so far,
that is. As the study of the
universe expands, we cannot know
with certainty what we will
encounter. Other scientific "facts,"
drawn from inductive logic, have
crumbled as a new piece of evidence
was found. The weakness with
inductive reasoning, then, is that
it relies on partial knowledge to
draw conclusions about "truth." In
the case of medical science, this
weakness can be harmful, if not
tragic. When medical researchers
draw their conclusions on what is
right for ALL people based on what
they have observed to be right for
SOME people, they run the risk of
doing irreparable harm to many
people. |
Take the example of
appendectomies. Medical doctors had
studied this curious organ for a
long time and had never found a
useful purpose for it. They
concluded therefore, that it had
no useful purpose. When it became
inflamed or otherwise troublesome,
they removed it. It took years for
the medical profession to admit that
its reasoning was incorrect, and to
seek other means of treating
appendicitis.
Medical science
still stands by most of its other
conclusions, however, even though
they were arrived at by the same
reliance on inductive reasoning.
Moreover, it adheres to the "rules"
with a rigidity that often does not
allow for individual differences.
Scientists discovered that the
average temperature for a human
being is 98.6 degrees Fahrenheit. If
you have a 99.3 degree temperature,
you're said to be "running a fever"
and you're given medications to
bring the temperature back to
"normal."
The problem with
this type of reasoning is obvious.
No one perfectly fits the profile of
the "average" human being – not in
height, weight, or even body
temperature. It is incorrect to
conclude that the correct
temperature for all members of the
human race is the same as the
"average" temperature of a sample of
individual members.
Long ago, clothing
manufacturers realized that all
people are different. They would
love it if all size people were
exactly the same. They wouldn't have
to produce a size 12 petite as well
as a size 12 tall, medium, and
large. Even so, it seems impossible
at times to find something that fits
right! The only way to get a really
good fit is to have the item
custom-made.
If you go to a
tailor and order a new outfit,
someone takes your exact
measurements. Can you imagine the
tailor saying, "The average human
being is 5'7" tall, 180 pounds, with
a 34" inseam. I'll use those
measurements to make your wardrobe?"
You would, no doubt, look for a new
tailor.
Yet, because of
the total reliance on inductive
reasoning, science – particularly
medical science – uses
"off-the-rack" diagnoses, remedies,
and medications. They routinely
begin to stitch a wardrobe together
using only "average" measurements.
Is it any wonder, then, that their
suits seldom fit right? |
|
|
PHILOSOPHY III |
by Terry A. Rondberg,
D.C. |
"DEDUCTIVE
REASONING"
Deductive reasoning: The sum
of the parts is MORE than just
some of its parts!
|
|
As we saw in Philosophy II,
inductive reasoning goes from
the small to the large. That
is, it makes observations
about individual parts and,
based on that knowledge, draws
conclusions about the whole.
Deductive reasoning
turns that thinking around. It
starts with major premises
and, based on those ideas,
deduces the truth about each
individual part of the whole.
For example, let's assume
that we accept, as our major
premise, that telling a lie is
wrong. Once we decide that
this premise is "true," it
automatically follows, by
deductive reasoning, that it
is wrong if you lie, if the
man down the street lies, if
the leader of a foreign
country lies, if anyone
lies. The basic premise
applies to everything,
everywhere at every time –
without exception.
Many of the premises upon
which we base our deductive
reasoning are universally
accepted because they are
considered "self-evident
truths." These are the axioms
which must merely be taken for
granted because they cannot or
need not be proved.
One of the most
commonly-known premises is
that "all men are created
equal," a statement of fact
which formed the very basis of
our Constitution. The founders
of our country recognized the
validity of this precept
through an inborn sense of
morality and humanity. They
did not feel they had to
"prove" it.
Other premises are arrived
at through long, careful
analysis and study. For
instance, scientists
formulated a theory about
"black holes" based on basic
premises regarding gravity and
mass. For many years, they
never found a single example
of such a phenomena, but that
did not lessen their belief in
the premise. If the
over-riding principles were
correct, then the premise HAD
to be correct. Finally, they
were able to find the physical
evidence which verified the
premise.
The single most important
premise of chiropractic
philosophy is that there is
an intelligent order to the
universe, which gives to
matter its properties and
actions, thus maintaining its
existence. It is becoming
equally accepted by the "new"
quantum physics, astronomy,
biology, and many other
sciences. No longer can anyone
study the universe and believe
it, and each part of it, is
random. There is an order
which organizes it and allows
it to survive and continue.
|
Once we accept this major
premise – that the universe as
a whole is guided by an
intelligent order – we may
logically conclude that each
part of the universe is also
guided by that intelligence.
This applies to everything,
everywhere, at every time.
Just as there are
weaknesses with inductive
reasoning, there can be flaws
in deductive reasoning. The
most obvious danger comes in
formulating and accepting the
major premises. The
assumptions must either be so
self-evident that no
reasonable person could
possibly object (all men
are created equal), or one
which can be proven by
clinical studies or physical
observations (black holes
exist). These premises
cannot be adopted merely as
matters of blind faith which
fly in the face of all
evidence (the earth is flat
– a premise which once was
considered a known "fact").
To arrive at truth, it is
best to use a combination of
both deductive and inductive
logic. Starting with deductive
reasoning, we can formulate a
basic premise upon which all
else can follow. Then, through
clinical studies and inductive
reasoning, we can verify the
accuracy of that premise.
Unlike much of modern
medicine, chiropractic uses
this ideal combination. It
starts with the major premise
that there is order to the
universe. Spreading out from
that point, we can assume that
each part of the universe,
including the human body, is
also organized in an orderly,
intelligent fashion.
Based on this premise,
chiropractic was developed as
a way to minimize the
interference to this natural
order in the human body. But
chiropractic does not stop
there. It also uses the
inductive method to study
individuals and relate those
specific cases to the "bigger"
picture. Its extensive
clinical and survey research
has helped to prove, in
concrete and
scientifically-acceptable
terms, both the efficacy of
chiropractic and the truth
behind chiropractic
philosophy.
But, for chiropractors, the
emphasis is on "The Big
Idea," the major premise
in which all knowledge and
conclusions are rooted. For it
is only when we see that
big idea clearly that the
truths about each one of us,
and every living thing in the
universe, can be known.
|
|
|
PHILOSOPHY IV |
by Terry A.
Rondberg, D.C. |
"UNIVERSAL INTELLIGENCE"
Nothing in the natural
order of the universe is
random ... our existence
is not mere "luck."
|
|
Because chiropractic is
a deductive science, it
begins with a major
premise upon which all
other conclusions are
based. That primary
assumption is that a
Universal Intelligence
is in all matter and
continually gives to it
all its properties and
actions, thus
maintaining it in
existence.
This premise was not
adopted as a matter of
blind faith or religious
fervor. It is a
conclusion based on
observation of physical
evidence. Look around
you. Does it seem
logical to think that
everything in the
universe is the result
of mere random selection
or "luck"? Is it "luck"
that a bird's wing is
perfectly designed for
flight – right down to
the tiniest pinfeather?
Is it just "chance" that
a plant's roots travel
downward into the ground
(where it will find
water and minerals) and
its leaves grow upward
(where it will find sun
and air)? If the
universe were truly just
random, at least some
plants would send their
roots straight upward,
and would bury their
leaves in the soil. Have
you ever seen such a
plant?
To think that the
universe is devoid of
intelligent organization
is like thinking that
the Great Pyramids of
Giza were the result of
an accidental rock
slide. Could any random
action have created the
Pyramids? The Empire
State Building? The
wings of a bird? The
roots and leaves of a
plant?
Just as it takes
human intelligence to
create and maintain the
architectural wonders,
it took intelligence to
create the natural
"wonders" which surround
us. Of course, human
intelligence could not
be responsible for the
complex order of the
universe – it hasn't yet
even begun to understand
a tiny part of it!
Since it was not
human intelligence, it
had to be something
greater than that. That
"something" is what we
call Universal
Intelligence. We don't
know what it is, where
it came from, what its
intent is, or even if
there is an intent
involved. We know only
that it must exist – or
nothing else would!
Is this Universal
Intelligence God? No one
knows. There is no way
to "prove" the existence
of God, or describe
God's characteristics.
There is no way to
"prove" the existence of
Universal Intelligence,
or to describe its
characteristics. How,
then can anyone say if
they mean the same
thing? |
There are some people
who believe that God is
the source of that
Universal Intelligence.
Others can accept the
concept of a Universal
Intelligence without
even believing in a
God. Either way, we
know, through
observation and
deductive reasoning,
that such an
intelligence must
exist in order to
prevent all matter from
decaying into chaos.
During the Age of
Technology – in which
the scientific method
reigned supreme – such
notions were often
criticized for being
"unscientific." What the
critics really meant was
that the premise
couldn't be proved, and
wasn't arrived at
through inductive
reasoning. Of course,
neither was the notion
that "All Men Are
Created Equal," or that
there were space-going
vacuum cleaners called
black holes (a theory,
by the way, also scoffed
at when first
announced). Yet, the
first axiom doesn't
require proof, and the
second one was valid
even before proof was
found. So it is with the
premise of Universal
Intelligence; it is a
"truth" so basic that it
transcends science and
can be arrived at
only through
deductive logic.
Today, as science
expands in the "new
physics" and quantum
mechanics, a broader
view is being accepted.
New ideas are
cultivated, and
deductive reasoning is
being recognized as a
valid form of logic. The
realization that there
must exist a Universal
Intelligence is being
taken for granted at
last.
Chiropractors smile
at the notion that
"science" is only now
"discovering" that idea.
After all, their entire
profession is built
around that simple, yet
profound truth. Doctors
of chiropractic
understand that there is
order and intelligence
to the whole universe.
By deductive reasoning,
they also know that this
order and intelligence
applies to every part of
the universe, including
the human body.
That conclusion leads
directly to another one
of the principle
premises of chiropractic
philosophy: A living
thing has an inborn
intelligence within its
body, called Innate
Intelligence.
No word in
chiropractic philosophy
is as filled with
meaning as the word
"Innate," for it refers
to the only element that
sets living beings apart
from nonliving things,
and is the reason that
chiropractic exists. |
|
|
PHILOSOPHY
VI |
by
Terry A.
Rondberg,
D.C. |
"UNIVERSAL FORCES
... INNATE ENERGY"
Tame a
lightning bolt –
and you have the
Innate Force
contained in the
human brain.
|
|
The universe is
filled with
natural forms of
energy. In fact,
astronomers say
that the universe
was actually
created by a burst
of energy which
pre-dated all
matter. The "big
bang" theory is
still being
debated, but we
need no theories
to witness energy
at work around us.
Wind rushes
through the trees,
water cascades
down a mountain,
lightning streaks
through the sky,
solar radiation
heats our earth.
For the most
part, these
environmental
forces co-exist
peacefully with
all life forms. At
times, however,
they demonstrate
their magnificent
power and
destructive
potential. The
wind increases to
hurricane velocity
and rips roofs off
houses;
floodwaters carry
off buildings and
uproots trees;
lightning splits
open giant trees
and sets off
raging fires.
Such
destruction can
seem "meaningless"
and we often talk
about "Mother
Nature going
crazy." But
scientists and
environmentalists
now acknowledge
that the
devastation has
its purpose in the
natural scheme of
things.
A fire started
by lightning, for
example, is an
efficient way to
thin a stand of
trees. When a
forest becomes
overgrown, the
lush vegetation
cuts sunlight off
at the ground
level, making it
impossible for new
seedlings to grow.
The "destruction"
of a fire provides
the new generation
of trees the light
and compost it
will need if the
forest is to
survive.
When that same
forest is
"managed" by
humans, the
naturally-set
fires are often
extinguished.
Then, these same
caretakers
deliberately set
fires to do the
job the
extinguished fire
would have done.
There is a purpose
to the fires, and
to the hurricanes
and floods.
There is an
order to their
appearance, and an
intelligence to
their functioning.
The Universal
Intelligence
"knows" that
forests need
thinning, and
using the
Universal Matter
available to it to
accomplish this.
The link which
enables the
intelligence to
use the matter is
natural energy, or
Universal Forces.
For most of
human history, the
best we could do
was try to stay
out of the way of
these forces. In
modern times, our
educated minds
have developed
means of adapting
them for
constructive
purposes.
|
We build
wind-powered
generators,
hydroelectric
plants, irrigation
canals, dams, and
solar heating
panels to harness
these energy
sources. We've
even learned to
adapt the
electricity
showcased in a
lightning bolt to
our purposes.
Living things
are like
microcosms of the
universe. We've
seen how they are
each endowed with
a portion of the
Universal
Intelligence,
called the Innate
Intelligence. They
also possess the
"specialized"
version of
Universal Forces,
which
chiropractors call
Innate Energy. Our
Innate
Intelligence takes
the Universal
Force of
electricity and
adapts it for
constructive use,
just as our
educated minds
have adapted
natural forces.
The fact that
the human body
runs on
electricity is
well-documented.
Many medical
testing
instruments
actually record
and measure the
electrical
impulses which are
generated (or,
some say,
converted from
some other source)
by our brain for
use in the body.
There may also be
other innate
forces at work in
our bodies that we
have not yet
identified, but
electricity is the
one we have proven
to exist.
Because Innate
Energy is being
adapted in our
body by the Innate
Intelligence, it
can never be
destructive. That
can occur only in
"wild" Universal
Forces which have
not been tamed by
the educated mind.
Also, since it is
created and
directed by the
Innate
Intelligence,
there is 100% of
the Innate Energy
needed by each
particular living
thing. The energy
is needed to impel
the cells to
function according
to the wishes of
the intelligence.
In nature, matter
remains inert
until energy is
applied. The air
and water remains
stagnant, and the
internal molecular
structure of the
tree stays stable
– until energy is
applied. Only then
do changes occur
in the matter
which cause motion
and function.
So it is in the
body. The Innate
Intelligence
cannot manipulate
matter without
energy. The
muscles cannot
expand or contract
in accordance with
the instructions
of Innate
Intelligence
unless energy is
present. In fact,
in the absence of
Innate Energy, the
body ceases to
function – ceases
to live.
Innate Energy,
then, serves as
the vital link
which enables the
intelligence to
express itself
through matter.
The three
elements, taken
together, form the
Triune of Life,
one of the most
important concepts
in chiropractic
philosophy. |
|
|
PHILOSOPHY
VII |
by
Terry
A.
Rondberg,
D.C. |
"THE TRIUNE"
The
Triune of
Life =
Innate
Intelligence
+ Innate
Energy +
Innate
Matter
|
|
According to
the precepts
of
chiropractic
philosophy,
every living
thing has
100% of the
Innate
Intelligence
it needs AND
100% of the
Innate Force
it needs. It
also has a
given
physical
form, to
make up the
third
element of
the Tribune.
In order
to have
perfect
health,
there must
be 100% of
intelligence,
100% of
force, and
100% of
matter. That
is, all
three
elements
must be
present in
optimum
quantity and
quality. We
have already
seen that
this is
always true
of the first
two
elements.
However, the
structure of
our "matter"
– our
physical
bodies – is
sometimes
less than
100%. There
may be flaws
in our
bodies or
its
abilities
(temporary
or
permanent)
which hinder
the
expression
of the
intelligence.
For human
beings, that
means that
"perfect
health" is a
relative
term. Each
of us can be
only as
healthy as
the limits
in our
physical
matter
permit.
People born
with
congenital
heart
defects, for
instance,
can only be
as healthy
as their
structures
will permit.
People
who have
undergone
amputation
of a arm
cannot
regrow that
limb, even
when there
is 100%
intelligence
and 100%
energy.
There are
limitations
inherent in
the human
body which
cannot be
transcended
by Innate
Intelligence.
However,
within the
limits
imposed by
our
particular
physical
structure,
our Innate
Intelligence
and Innate
Energy will
strive to
maintain the
highest
level of
health
possible.
Sometimes,
that effort
is thwarted
by
interferences
to the
normal
transmission
of the
energy to
the matter.
To see
what kind of
interference
your body
may be
experiencing,
we need to
understand
how the
Innate
Intelligence
directs the
body parts
through
Innate
Energy.
As we
noted, the
brain
generates,
or converts,
the
electrical
impulses
which will
spur the
individual
cells and
tells them
what they
need to do
to adapt to
the current
needs of the
body. Those
impulses are
propelled
along a
complex
system of
nerves which
connect the
brain to the
organs,
tissues,
glands, and
cells of the
body.
|
Think of the
nerve system
as a thick
rope, made
of numerous
individual
strands
bundled
together.
When this
nerve "rope"
exits the
brain, it
travels down
the spine,
protected by
a flexible
bony
structure.
As it
progresses
downward,
sections of
the rope
separate and
pass through
small
openings
between the
spinal bones
(vertebrae).
Later, they
separate
further
until each
individual
strand
connects
with its
designated
target.
Occasionally,
however, the
vertebrae
become
subluxated
(out of
their proper
alignment),
and close
off part of
the opening.
This can
"impinge" on
the nerve
and decrease
or distort
the normal
flow of
| | | | | | | |